Chiji Longinus Ezeji


Crime has predominantly increased in Nigeria, criminals have targeted critical national infrastructure, banking sectors, some of the governmental departments, private and public institutions. The need has risen for the law enforcement to adopt a unique strategy of policing in combating and preventing crime in Nigeria. There is a need for a smarter approach to policing that turns away from the traditional reactive style used in the past, to a proactive framework that focuses on employing analysis and criminal intelligence to reduce and prevent prolific recidivist offenders. The main reason for instituting criminal justice system is to prevent, reduce, combat and eliminate crime but in practice, it will be difficult to achieve this goal, due to the lack of cooperation between the criminal justice system officials and other governmental structures, departments and communities, can hinder safety and security around different communities in Nigeria. The study focuses on the evaluation of smarter policing paradigm that can be effective in combating crime in Nigeria. The paper adopted qualitative methodology; an interview technique was used to collect data. Findings reveal that Nigeria lacks intelligence capacities in addressing crime, few personnel are specifically trained on how to operationalize intelligence in addressing crime in Nigeria. Reactive policing is not effective in combating crime. The recommendation includes need to engage officers in specialised intelligence training, should transcend to more proactive strategy and should adopt a smarter policing model to tackle insecurity in Nigeria.


Smarter policing, Paradigm, Effective, Crime Control, Combating insecurity and Nigeria

Full Text:



Burger, F. (2005). A strategic perspective on the role of the police in combating crime,

Pretoria: Tshwane University of Technology.

De-cock, N. (2004). Managing police patrol time, the role of supervisors and detectives,

Justice Quarterly 22(4) 23-65.

Davis, R. and Robert, C. (2003). Selected international best practice in police

performance measurement, Santa Monica, CA: Rand Cooperation.

Eck, J., Edwards, R. and Maguire, T. (2006). When is a bologna sandwich better than

sex, a defense of small case evaluation? Journal of Experimental

Criminology 2(2) 345-362.

Ezeji, C. (2017). Evaluation of intelligence led policing and crime prevention, Pretoria:

Tshwane University of Technology Press.

Gilbert, D. (2010). Criminal investigation. 3rd ed. London: Melville.

Gills, P. (2013). Organised crime in routledge companion to intelligence studies,

edited by Robert Dover, Oxford: Routledge.

Khalsa, L. (2006). Intelligence crime intelligence in reduction and prevention of crime,

(eds.), Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Lowenthal, C. (2006). Crime and its causes and remedies, USA, NJ: Patterson Smith.

Moore, M. (2003). Improving policing through experts, experience and experiment,

New York: Cambridge University Press.

Outola, A. (2011). Crime prevention and the criminal justice of Nigeria and South Africa,

A comparative perspective. Pretoria: Tshwane University of Technology.

Ratcliffe, J. (2009). The structure of strategic thinking in criminal intelligence, (eds.)

Sydney: Federal Press.

Ratcliffe, J. (2014). What is the future of predicting policing, Journal of Translational

Criminology 20(1) 40-45.

Scott, M. (2000). Getting police to take problem oriented policing seriously,

Crime Prevention Studies 15(3) 49-77.

Sherman, L. (2013). Targeting testing and tracking police services, the rise of evidence

based policing. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Weisburd, D. and Telep, C. (2014). Hot spot policing, what we know and what we need

to know. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice 30(2):200-220.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2021 Chiji Longinus Ezeji







Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.