BRICKS AND WOODS UNDER THE ROOF: AN EXAMINATION OF PERSONAL PRONOUNS AS A COHESIVE DEVICE IN OSOFISAN’S MANY COLOURS MAKE THE THUNDER KING
Abstract
Cohesion is of significant relevance in the use of English Language given that it provides the platform for the relation between words to make it a unified whole. As much as works abounds on cohesion in English Language, to the best of our knowledge, very little has been done in investigating its application in the successful production of literary texts. This study, therefore, sets out to examine personal pronouns as a literary principle that motivates literary text productions so as to determine their values in text productions and interpretations. The first in the series, personal pronouns, are examined in Ahmed Yerima’s Many Colours Make the Thunder King. We found out that personal pronouns are employed to make anaphoric references which largely dominate the play as Osofisan builds the utterances as bricks are laid and woods structured under the roof. Notably, the first person singular person personal pronouns “I”, “me”, second person singular personal pronouns “you”, “your”, and third person singular person personal pronouns “he”, “him”, “her”, and “his”, are the bricks and woods used in the construction of utterances in the play. Apart from contributing to scholarship in this direction in linguistic scholarship, the study revealed a significant use that a no-content word class pronoun can be to achieve cohesion and meaning relation in text production. This template can be employed in the examination of cohesion in other African literary plays.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adegbite, W. 2000. “Pragmatics: Some Basic Principles and Proscedures” Studies in English Language. Ed. Babajide, A.O. Ibadan: Enicrownfit pp 60-80.
Adegbite, W. 2005 “Pragmatics Tactics in Diplomatic Communication: A Case Study of Ola Rotimi’s Ovontamwen Nogbaisi”. Journal of Pragmatics, 37:1457-1480.
Banfiled, A. 1982. Unspeakable Sentences, England: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Bartens, H. 2001. Literary Theory: The Basics, London and New York: Routledge.
Barthes, R. 1972. Mythologies, New York: Hill and Wang.
Barthes, R 1994. Images – Music- Text, New York: Hill and Wang.
Bennett, T. 1979. Formalism and Marxism: London.
Culler, J. 1997. Literary Theory A very Short Introduction, Oxford; Oxford University Press.
Dasylva, A.O. 2004. Studies in Drama, Ibadan: Sam Bookman Educational and Communication Services.
Dobbie, A.B. 2002. Theory into Practices: An Introduction to literary criticism, Thompson London
Eagleton, T. 1978. Criticism and Ideology, New York: Schocken.
Eagleton, T. 1996. Literary Theory, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Ehrlich, S. 1990. Point of View: A linguistic Analysis of Literary Style. London and New York: Routledge.
Firth, J.R. 1962. “A Synopsis of Linguistic Theory “1930-1935”. Studies in Linguistic Analysis. London: Philosophical Society.
Fludernik, M. 1993. The Fiction of Language and the Languages of Fiction. London: Routledge.
Fowler, R. 1986. Linguistic Criticism. London: Oxford University Press.
Grice, H.P. 1975, ‘Logic and Conversation’ Syntax and Semantics, Ed. Peter C. and Jerry M. 3: Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press 41-58.
Halliday, M.A.K. and Hassan, R. 1976. Ohesion in English.London: Longman
Halliday, M.A.K. 1978. Language as Social Semiotic. London: Edward Arnold.
Hymes, D. 1962. :The Ethnograpghy of Speaking” in T. Gladwin and W.C. Sturvent (eds.) Anthropology and Human Behaviour. Anthropological Society of Washinton.
Hymes, D. 1962. “Toward Ethnographies of Communication: The Analysis of Communicative
Events” Language and Social Context. Ed. Gigioli P.P. Harmondsworth. Middx: Penguin Books. 21-44
Iji, E 2001. Background to Femi Osofisan’s Philosophy on Drama and Theatre, Calabar BAAJ International Company.
Jay, M. 1935. Marxism and Totality, Berkeley: University of California Press
Jefferson, A. and Robey, D. 1986. Modern Literary Theory: A Comparative Introduction, London: Batsford.
Leech, G. 1983. Principles of Pragmatics, London: Longman
Levinson, S. 1979. “Activity Types and Language” Linguistics 17 (516) 365-399.
Lyons, J. 1977. Theoretical Linguistics, London: Cambridge University Pres.
Magill, F.N. 1987. Critical Survey of Literary Theory, Pasadena: Salem Press.
Makaryk, I.R 1993. Ed. Encyclopedia of Contemporary Literary Theory: Approaches,
Schools, Terms. Toronto, University of Toronto Press.
Malinowski, B. 1923. ‘The Problems of Meaning in Primitive Languages’. The Meaning of Meaning. Eds. C.K. Ogden and I.A. Richards. New York: London. 296-336.
Mey. Jacob, L. 2000. When Voices Clash. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin: New York.
Mey, Jacob, L. 2001. Pragmatics: An Introduction, )2nd ed.). Blackwell, Malden, Mass and Oxford.
Natoli, J. 1987. Tracing Literary Theory, Chicago University of Illinois Press.
Odebunmi, A. 2001. The English Word and Meaning: an Introductrroy Text. Ogbomoso: Critical Sphere.
Odebunmi, A. 2006 (a). a pragmatic Reading of Ahmed Yerman’s Proverbs in Yemoja, Attahiru,
and Dry Leaves on Ukan Trees Intercultural Pragmatics 3-2. 153-169.
Odebunmi, A. 2006(b) Meaning in English: An introduction. Ogbomoso: Critical Sphere.
Odebunmi, A. 2008. Pragmatics Functions of Crisis-Motivated Proverbs in Ola Rotimin’s The
Osofisan, Femi 1991. Esu and the Vagabond Minstrels. Ibadan: New Horn Press Ltd.
Rivkin, J.R.M. 1998. Literary Theory: An Anthology Malden, Massachusetts: Blackwell.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 Ade Adeniji (PhD), Olagunju Sade (PhD)
ISSN: 3027-0510 (Online)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.